Vue Core Web Vitals

How real Chrome users experience vuejs.org, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.

Vue fails Core Web Vitals

Sep 26 – Oct 23, all devices

Chrome UX Report
INP
64 ms
Good
LCP
1.3 s
Good
CLS
0.11
Needs improvement
FCP
1.2 s
Good
TTFB
569 ms
Good

INP over time

Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.

What the numbers say

  • Vue fails Core Web Vitals on Cumulative Layout Shift (0.11, good is 0.10 or less).
  • Among 23 frameworks and docs sites we track, Vue has the 12th fastest LCP.
  • INP has held steady around 64 ms over the last 25 weeks.

Keep a site like this from getting slower

Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 2.5 s, CLS ≤ 0.11, FCP ≤ 1.8 s.

Other frameworks and docs sites

SiteCore Web VitalsLCPINPCLS
ReactPasses1.2 s78 ms0.00
Next.jsPasses1.2 s85 ms0.00
SveltePasses878 ms55 ms0.00
AstroPasses983 ms35 ms0.00
NuxtPasses1.5 s128 ms0.02
AngularPasses1.5 s78 ms0.06
RemixPasses1.4 s124 ms0.00
VitePasses1.3 s67 ms0.04
Tailwind CSSPasses1.3 s73 ms0.00
TypeScriptPasses1.5 s60 ms0.05
MDNPasses1.0 s52 ms0.01
web.devFails2.7 s134 ms0.09
Node.jsPasses1.1 s115 ms0.01
DenoPasses2.0 s63 ms0.00
BunPasses1.3 s95 ms0.01
PythonPasses909 ms23 ms0.03
DjangoPasses1.2 s37 ms0.00
LaravelPasses2.3 s135 ms0.01
Ruby on RailsPasses786 ms45 ms0.03
GoPasses1.6 s45 ms0.02
TanStackFails2.7 s176 ms0.01
shadcn/uiPasses1.0 s171 ms0.00