X Core Web Vitals

How real Chrome users experience x.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.

X fails Core Web Vitals

Sep 26 – Oct 23, all devices

Chrome UX Report
INP
334 ms
Needs improvement
LCP
4.4 s
Poor
CLS
0.07
Good
FCP
1.6 s
Good
TTFB
895 ms
Needs improvement

INP over time

Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.

What the numbers say

  • X fails Core Web Vitals on Largest Contentful Paint (4.4 s, good is 2.5 s or less) and Interaction to Next Paint (334 ms, good is 200 ms or less).
  • Time to first byte is 895 ms, so most of the LCP time is spent after the first byte: loading the main image, fonts or scripts.
  • Among 14 media and community sites we track, X has the 12th fastest LCP.
  • INP has improved by 20 ms over the last 25 weeks, from 355 ms to 335 ms.

Keep a site like this from getting slower

Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 4.4 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 1.8 s.

Other media and community sites

SiteCore Web VitalsLCPINPCLS
YouTubeFails4.7 s245 ms0.34
RedditPasses2.0 s144 ms0.01
LinkedInFails2.5 s226 ms0.07
MediumPasses2.4 s106 ms0.03
SubstackFails2.4 s203 ms0.02
dev.toPasses1.9 s82 ms0.00
Hacker NewsPasses554 ms44 ms0.00
Product HuntPasses2.2 s195 ms0.07
WikipediaPasses1.2 s81 ms0.00
The VergeFails1.4 s130 ms0.16
SpotifyFails5.9 s455 ms0.57
TwitchFails3.1 s303 ms0.23
NetflixFails3.7 s208 ms0.03