Asana Core Web Vitals

How real Chrome users experience asana.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.

Asana fails Core Web Vitals

Sep 25 – Oct 22, all devices

Chrome UX Report
INP
216 ms
Needs improvement
LCP
2.0 s
Good
CLS
0.15
Needs improvement
FCP
1.2 s
Good
TTFB
665 ms
Good

INP over time

Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.

What the numbers say

  • Asana fails Core Web Vitals on Cumulative Layout Shift (0.15, good is 0.10 or less) and Interaction to Next Paint (216 ms, good is 200 ms or less).
  • Among 16 productivity and collaboration sites we track, Asana has the 5th fastest LCP.
  • INP has worsened by 33 ms over the last 25 weeks, from 184 ms to 217 ms.

Keep a site like this from getting slower

Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 2.5 s, CLS ≤ 0.15, FCP ≤ 1.8 s.

Other productivity and collaboration sites

SiteCore Web VitalsLCPINPCLS
NotionFails4.9 s153 ms0.01
SlackPasses1.9 s83 ms0.07
TrelloFails3.9 s161 ms0.24
Monday.comPasses2.4 s177 ms0.02
ClickUpPasses2.4 s169 ms0.03
AirtablePasses1.9 s103 ms0.01
MiroFails4.9 s224 ms0.07
LoomFails4.2 s146 ms0.08
CalendlyFails5.3 s170 ms0.02
ZoomFails5.5 s113 ms0.07
DropboxFails3.8 s245 ms0.09
TodoistPasses1.4 s96 ms0.04
ObsidianPasses1.1 s45 ms0.00
DiscordFails6.3 s299 ms0.10
ZapierPasses2.2 s126 ms0.06