Calendly Core Web Vitals

How real Chrome users experience calendly.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.

Calendly fails Core Web Vitals

Sep 25 – Oct 22, all devices

Chrome UX Report
INP
170 ms
Good
LCP
5.3 s
Poor
CLS
0.02
Good
FCP
2.9 s
Needs improvement
TTFB
1.0 s
Needs improvement

INP over time

Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.

What the numbers say

  • Calendly fails Core Web Vitals on Largest Contentful Paint (5.3 s, good is 2.5 s or less).
  • Time to first byte is 1.0 s, so most of the LCP time is spent after the first byte: loading the main image, fonts or scripts.
  • Among 16 productivity and collaboration sites we track, Calendly has the 14th fastest LCP.
  • INP has worsened by 16 ms over the last 25 weeks, from 154 ms to 170 ms.

Keep a site like this from getting slower

Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 5.3 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 3.0 s.

Other productivity and collaboration sites

SiteCore Web VitalsLCPINPCLS
NotionFails4.9 s153 ms0.01
SlackPasses1.9 s83 ms0.07
AsanaFails2.0 s216 ms0.15
TrelloFails3.9 s161 ms0.24
Monday.comPasses2.4 s177 ms0.02
ClickUpPasses2.4 s169 ms0.03
AirtablePasses1.9 s103 ms0.01
MiroFails4.9 s224 ms0.07
LoomFails4.2 s146 ms0.08
ZoomFails5.5 s113 ms0.07
DropboxFails3.8 s245 ms0.09
TodoistPasses1.4 s96 ms0.04
ObsidianPasses1.1 s45 ms0.00
DiscordFails6.3 s299 ms0.10
ZapierPasses2.2 s126 ms0.06