Groq Core Web Vitals
How real Chrome users experience groq.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.
Groq passes Core Web Vitals
Sep 27 – Oct 24, all devices
INP
95 ms
Good
LCP
1.1 s
Good
CLS
0.00
Good
FCP
1.0 s
Good
TTFB
454 ms
Good
INP over time
Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.
What the numbers say
- Groq passes Core Web Vitals: LCP 1.1 s, CLS 0.00, INP 95 ms are all in Google's "good" range for 3 in 4 visits.
- Among 10 ai sites we track, Groq has the 2nd fastest LCP.
- INP has held steady around 95 ms over the last 25 weeks.
Keep a site like this from getting slower
Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 2.5 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 1.8 s.
Other ai sites
| Site | Core Web Vitals | LCP | INP | CLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | Fails | 2.9 s | 219 ms | 0.00 |
| ChatGPT | Fails | 4.2 s | 669 ms | 0.17 |
| Anthropic | Passes | 1.4 s | 67 ms | 0.00 |
| Claude | Fails | 2.7 s | 157 ms | 0.01 |
| Hugging Face | Passes | 1.1 s | 51 ms | 0.00 |
| Perplexity | Fails | 4.6 s | 353 ms | 0.03 |
| Midjourney | Fails | 2.7 s | 223 ms | 0.00 |
| Mistral AI | Fails | 2.9 s | 101 ms | 0.08 |
| Replicate | Passes | 2.4 s | 73 ms | 0.08 |