Midjourney Core Web Vitals

How real Chrome users experience www.midjourney.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.

Midjourney fails Core Web Vitals

Sep 27 – Oct 24, all devices

Chrome UX Report
INP
223 ms
Needs improvement
LCP
2.7 s
Needs improvement
CLS
0.00
Good
FCP
2.0 s
Needs improvement
TTFB
648 ms
Good

INP over time

Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.

What the numbers say

  • Midjourney fails Core Web Vitals on Largest Contentful Paint (2.7 s, good is 2.5 s or less) and Interaction to Next Paint (223 ms, good is 200 ms or less).
  • Time to first byte is 648 ms, so most of the LCP time is spent after the first byte: loading the main image, fonts or scripts.
  • Among 10 ai sites we track, Midjourney has the 5th fastest LCP.
  • INP has held steady around 223 ms over the last 25 weeks.

Keep a site like this from getting slower

Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 2.8 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 2.0 s.

Other ai sites

SiteCore Web VitalsLCPINPCLS
OpenAIFails2.9 s219 ms0.00
ChatGPTFails4.2 s669 ms0.17
AnthropicPasses1.4 s67 ms0.00
ClaudeFails2.7 s157 ms0.01
Hugging FacePasses1.1 s51 ms0.00
PerplexityFails4.6 s353 ms0.03
Mistral AIFails2.9 s101 ms0.08
ReplicatePasses2.4 s73 ms0.08
GroqPasses1.1 s95 ms0.00