Polar Core Web Vitals

How real Chrome users experience polar.sh, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.

Polar fails Core Web Vitals

Sep 26 – Oct 23, all devices

Chrome UX Report
INP
132 ms
Good
LCP
2.7 s
Needs improvement
CLS
0.08
Good
FCP
2.2 s
Needs improvement
TTFB
1.2 s
Needs improvement

INP over time

Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.

What the numbers say

  • Polar fails Core Web Vitals on Largest Contentful Paint (2.7 s, good is 2.5 s or less).
  • The server answers slowly: time to first byte is 1.2 s, 45% of the LCP time, so a faster backend or cache would help most.
  • Among 16 payments and business sites we track, Polar has the 13th fastest LCP.
  • INP has held steady around 131 ms over the last 25 weeks.

Keep a site like this from getting slower

Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 2.7 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 2.2 s.

Other payments and business sites

SiteCore Web VitalsLCPINPCLS
StripePasses1.5 s101 ms0.01
PayPalPasses2.4 s137 ms0.03
ShopifyFails1.8 s202 ms0.00
HubSpotPasses2.3 s123 ms0.08
SalesforceFails4.0 s323 ms0.03
IntercomPasses1.8 s81 ms0.03
MailchimpPasses1.3 s145 ms0.01
ResendPasses2.3 s174 ms0.00
TwilioPasses2.3 s100 ms0.05
GumroadPasses1.8 s92 ms0.03
Lemon SqueezyPasses2.3 s50 ms0.01
PaddlePasses1.3 s98 ms0.00
SquarespaceFails3.4 s158 ms0.03
WixPasses2.3 s188 ms0.02
WordPress.comFails3.2 s120 ms0.02