Adobe Core Web Vitals
How real Chrome users experience www.adobe.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.
Adobe fails Core Web Vitals
Sep 27 – Oct 24, all devices
INP
147 ms
Good
LCP
3.2 s
Needs improvement
CLS
0.06
Good
FCP
2.9 s
Needs improvement
TTFB
1.1 s
Needs improvement
INP over time
Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.
What the numbers say
- Adobe fails Core Web Vitals on Largest Contentful Paint (3.2 s, good is 2.5 s or less).
- Time to first byte is 1.1 s, so most of the LCP time is spent after the first byte: loading the main image, fonts or scripts.
- Among 9 design sites we track, Adobe has the 7th fastest LCP.
- INP has worsened by 40 ms over the last 25 weeks, from 107 ms to 147 ms.
Keep a site like this from getting slower
Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 3.2 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 3.0 s.