Figma Core Web Vitals
How real Chrome users experience www.figma.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.
Figma fails Core Web Vitals
Sep 27 – Oct 24, all devices
INP
265 ms
Needs improvement
LCP
8.8 s
Poor
CLS
0.03
Good
FCP
4.9 s
Poor
TTFB
1.2 s
Needs improvement
INP over time
Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.
What the numbers say
- Figma fails Core Web Vitals on Largest Contentful Paint (8.8 s, good is 2.5 s or less) and Interaction to Next Paint (265 ms, good is 200 ms or less).
- Time to first byte is 1.2 s, so most of the LCP time is spent after the first byte: loading the main image, fonts or scripts.
- Among 9 design sites we track, Figma has the 9th fastest LCP.
- INP has held steady around 265 ms over the last 25 weeks.
Keep a site like this from getting slower
Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 8.9 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 5.0 s.