Webflow Core Web Vitals

How real Chrome users experience webflow.com, from Google's Chrome UX Report: the 75th percentile of visits on every device.

Webflow fails Core Web Vitals

Sep 25 – Oct 22, all devices

Chrome UX Report
INP
102 ms
Good
LCP
3.9 s
Needs improvement
CLS
0.03
Good
FCP
2.3 s
Needs improvement
TTFB
773 ms
Good

INP over time

Weekly p75. The dashed line is the 200 ms "good" threshold.

What the numbers say

  • Webflow fails Core Web Vitals on Largest Contentful Paint (3.9 s, good is 2.5 s or less).
  • Time to first byte is 773 ms, so most of the LCP time is spent after the first byte: loading the main image, fonts or scripts.
  • Among 9 design sites we track, Webflow has the 8th fastest LCP.
  • INP has held steady around 101 ms over the last 25 weeks.

Keep a site like this from getting slower

Real-user data shows a regression weeks after it ships. Vitalgate runs Lighthouse on every pull request and fails the check when a change breaks budgets like these: LCP ≤ 3.9 s, CLS ≤ 0.10, FCP ≤ 2.4 s.

Other design sites

SiteCore Web VitalsLCPINPCLS
FigmaFails8.8 s265 ms0.03
FramerPasses1.2 s86 ms0.02
DribbblePasses1.8 s131 ms0.04
BehanceFails3.0 s144 ms0.03
AdobeFails3.2 s147 ms0.06
SketchFails2.8 s112 ms0.08
UnsplashPasses2.3 s159 ms0.00
PexelsFails2.3 s436 ms0.04